Background. The aim of this study was to characterize the immune response against intrabone marrow (BM-Tx) or intraliver (liver-Tx) transplanted islets in the presence or in the absence of immunosuppression. Methods. Less (C57BL/6 in Balb/c) and highly (Balb/c in C57BL/6) stringent major histocompatibility complex fully mismatched mouse models were used to evaluate the alloimmune response. Single antigen-mismatched mouse model (C57BL/6 RIP-GP in C57BL/6) was used to evaluate the antigen-specific immune response.Mice received tacrolimus (FK-506, 0.1mg/kg per day)/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, 60mg/kg per day), and anti-CD3 (50 ?g/day) either alone or in combination. Results. Transplant site did not impact the timing nor the kinetics of the alloimmune and single antigen-specificmemory Tcell responses in the absence of immunosuppression or in the presence of MMF/FK-506 combination. On the other hand, the median time to graft rejection was 28 ± 5.2 days and 16 ± 2.6 days (P = 0.14) in the presence of anti-CD3 treatment, 50 ± 12.5 days and 10 ± 1.3 days (P = 0.003) in the presence of anti-CD3/ MMF/FK-506 treatment for liver-Tx and BM-Tx, respectively. Anti-CD3 did not differentially reach BM and liver tissues but was more effective in reducing graft associated Tcell responses in liver-Tx than in BM-Tx. Conclusions. Islets infused in the BM appear less protected from the adaptive immune response in the presence of the anti-CD3 treatment. This result raises some concerns over the potential of the BM as a site for islet allotransplantation. Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Transplant site influences the immune response after islet transplantation: Bone marrow versus liver / Cantarelli, E.; Citro, A.; Pellegrini, S.; Mercalli, A.; Melzi, R.; Dugnani, E.; Jofra, T.; Fousteri, G.; Mondino, A.; Piemonti, Lorenzo. - In: TRANSPLANTATION. - ISSN 0041-1337. - 101:5(2017), pp. 1046-1055. [10.1097/TP.0000000000001462]

Transplant site influences the immune response after islet transplantation: Bone marrow versus liver

PIEMONTI, LORENZO
Ultimo
2017-01-01

Abstract

Background. The aim of this study was to characterize the immune response against intrabone marrow (BM-Tx) or intraliver (liver-Tx) transplanted islets in the presence or in the absence of immunosuppression. Methods. Less (C57BL/6 in Balb/c) and highly (Balb/c in C57BL/6) stringent major histocompatibility complex fully mismatched mouse models were used to evaluate the alloimmune response. Single antigen-mismatched mouse model (C57BL/6 RIP-GP in C57BL/6) was used to evaluate the antigen-specific immune response.Mice received tacrolimus (FK-506, 0.1mg/kg per day)/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, 60mg/kg per day), and anti-CD3 (50 ?g/day) either alone or in combination. Results. Transplant site did not impact the timing nor the kinetics of the alloimmune and single antigen-specificmemory Tcell responses in the absence of immunosuppression or in the presence of MMF/FK-506 combination. On the other hand, the median time to graft rejection was 28 ± 5.2 days and 16 ± 2.6 days (P = 0.14) in the presence of anti-CD3 treatment, 50 ± 12.5 days and 10 ± 1.3 days (P = 0.003) in the presence of anti-CD3/ MMF/FK-506 treatment for liver-Tx and BM-Tx, respectively. Anti-CD3 did not differentially reach BM and liver tissues but was more effective in reducing graft associated Tcell responses in liver-Tx than in BM-Tx. Conclusions. Islets infused in the BM appear less protected from the adaptive immune response in the presence of the anti-CD3 treatment. This result raises some concerns over the potential of the BM as a site for islet allotransplantation. Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/61150
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 26
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 19
social impact