Background: Aim of the study was to investigate whether late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) at cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) predict reverse remodeling (RR) in non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM). Methods: Seventy-one NIDCM patients (age 57. ±. 14. years, 43 males, median left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 35%, [interquartile range 27-41%]) with two CMR scans within 5. years were included. RR was defined as ≥. 10% reduction in left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume and ≥. 10% LVEF increase. The end-point was a composite of all-cause death, cardiovascular hospitalization or appropriate defibrillator discharge. LGE was assessed both visually and as percentage of LV mass (LGE%). Results: LGE was present in 42 patients (59%). During the interval between the 2 CMR scans (median 28 [15-44]. months), 22 patients (31%) displayed RR. LGE absence predicted RR irrespectively of baseline LV volumes and LVEF. Over a median 42[15-73]-month follow-up, the endpoint occurred in 36 patients (51%). LGE absence was associated with better prognosis (P = 0.043), with best quantitative LGE cut-point <. 7% at ROC analysis (P = 0.017), but RR was the strongest prognostic predictor. Among 35 patients with baseline LVEF <. 35%, 25 (69%) crossed the 35% LVEF threshold. Both LGE absence and quantitative LGE <. 7% were associated with crossing of the 35% LVEF threshold for defibrillator implantation; patients with either LGE or quantitative LGE. ≥. 7% had a worse prognosis. Conclusions: In NIDCM, the absence of LGE at baseline CMR is associated with RR. When baseline LVEF is <. 35%, LGE absence is associated with more frequent crossing of the 35% LVEF threshold for defibrillator implantation.

Late gadolinium enhancement as a predictor of functional recovery, need for defibrillator implantation and prognosis in non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy

CAMICI, PAOLO;
2017-01-01

Abstract

Background: Aim of the study was to investigate whether late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) at cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) predict reverse remodeling (RR) in non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM). Methods: Seventy-one NIDCM patients (age 57. ±. 14. years, 43 males, median left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 35%, [interquartile range 27-41%]) with two CMR scans within 5. years were included. RR was defined as ≥. 10% reduction in left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume and ≥. 10% LVEF increase. The end-point was a composite of all-cause death, cardiovascular hospitalization or appropriate defibrillator discharge. LGE was assessed both visually and as percentage of LV mass (LGE%). Results: LGE was present in 42 patients (59%). During the interval between the 2 CMR scans (median 28 [15-44]. months), 22 patients (31%) displayed RR. LGE absence predicted RR irrespectively of baseline LV volumes and LVEF. Over a median 42[15-73]-month follow-up, the endpoint occurred in 36 patients (51%). LGE absence was associated with better prognosis (P = 0.043), with best quantitative LGE cut-point <. 7% at ROC analysis (P = 0.017), but RR was the strongest prognostic predictor. Among 35 patients with baseline LVEF <. 35%, 25 (69%) crossed the 35% LVEF threshold. Both LGE absence and quantitative LGE <. 7% were associated with crossing of the 35% LVEF threshold for defibrillator implantation; patients with either LGE or quantitative LGE. ≥. 7% had a worse prognosis. Conclusions: In NIDCM, the absence of LGE at baseline CMR is associated with RR. When baseline LVEF is <. 35%, LGE absence is associated with more frequent crossing of the 35% LVEF threshold for defibrillator implantation.
2017
Cardiac magnetic resonance; Heart failure; Late gadolinium enhancement; Prognosis; Reverse remodeling; Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/70171
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 38
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 37
social impact