Background: Historically, partial nephrectomy (PN) showed no benefit on other-cause mortality (OCM) in elderly patients with small renal masses. Objective: To test the effect of PN versus radical nephrectomy (RN) on OCM, cancer-specific mortality (CSM), as well as 30-d mortality in patients with nonmetastatic T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC), aged ≥75 yr old. Design, setting, and participants: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registry (2004-2014), we identified surgically treated patients with nonmetastatic pT1a RCC aged ≥75 yr. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: We relied on propensity score (PS) matching to reduce the effect of inherent differences between PN and RN. After PS matching, cumulative incidence, multivariable competing-risks regression (CRR) and logistic regression models were used. LOESS plots graphically depicted the relation between nephrectomy type and OCM after adjustment for all the covariates. Landmark analyses at 6 mo tested for immortal time bias. Results and limitations: Of all 4541 patients, 41.6% underwent PN. After 1:1 PS matching, 2826 patients remained. In multivariable CRR models, lower OCM rates were recorded in PN patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.67, confidence interval [CI]: 0.54-0.84; p< 0.001). LOESS plots showed lower OCM rates after PN across all examined ages. Lower CSM rates were also recorded in PN patients (HR: 0.64, CI = 0.44-0.92; p = 0.02). Landmark analyses rejected the hypothesis of immortal time bias. Finally, PN did not result in different 30-d mortality rates (odds ratio: 1.87; CI: 0.79-4.47; p = 0.2) versus RN. Data are retrospective. Conclusions: PN results in lower OCM in elderly patients with pT1a RCC. Moreover, PN does not contribute to higher CSM or 30-d mortality in patients aged ≥75 yr. In consequence, PN should be given strong consideration, even in elderly patients. Patient summary: Partial nephrectomy (PN) may protect from renal insufficiency, hypertension, and other unfavorable health outcomes, even in elderly patients. This protective effect results in lower other-cause mortality. Moreover, PN benefits are not undermined by higher cancer-specific mortality or 30-d mortality. Partial nephrectomy should be given strong consideration even in elderly patients.

Comparison of Partial Versus Radical Nephrectomy Effect on Other-cause Mortality, Cancer-specific Mortality, and 30-day Mortality in Patients Older Than 75 Years

Briganti, Alberto;Montorsi, Francesco;
2019-01-01

Abstract

Background: Historically, partial nephrectomy (PN) showed no benefit on other-cause mortality (OCM) in elderly patients with small renal masses. Objective: To test the effect of PN versus radical nephrectomy (RN) on OCM, cancer-specific mortality (CSM), as well as 30-d mortality in patients with nonmetastatic T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC), aged ≥75 yr old. Design, setting, and participants: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registry (2004-2014), we identified surgically treated patients with nonmetastatic pT1a RCC aged ≥75 yr. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: We relied on propensity score (PS) matching to reduce the effect of inherent differences between PN and RN. After PS matching, cumulative incidence, multivariable competing-risks regression (CRR) and logistic regression models were used. LOESS plots graphically depicted the relation between nephrectomy type and OCM after adjustment for all the covariates. Landmark analyses at 6 mo tested for immortal time bias. Results and limitations: Of all 4541 patients, 41.6% underwent PN. After 1:1 PS matching, 2826 patients remained. In multivariable CRR models, lower OCM rates were recorded in PN patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.67, confidence interval [CI]: 0.54-0.84; p< 0.001). LOESS plots showed lower OCM rates after PN across all examined ages. Lower CSM rates were also recorded in PN patients (HR: 0.64, CI = 0.44-0.92; p = 0.02). Landmark analyses rejected the hypothesis of immortal time bias. Finally, PN did not result in different 30-d mortality rates (odds ratio: 1.87; CI: 0.79-4.47; p = 0.2) versus RN. Data are retrospective. Conclusions: PN results in lower OCM in elderly patients with pT1a RCC. Moreover, PN does not contribute to higher CSM or 30-d mortality in patients aged ≥75 yr. In consequence, PN should be given strong consideration, even in elderly patients. Patient summary: Partial nephrectomy (PN) may protect from renal insufficiency, hypertension, and other unfavorable health outcomes, even in elderly patients. This protective effect results in lower other-cause mortality. Moreover, PN benefits are not undermined by higher cancer-specific mortality or 30-d mortality. Partial nephrectomy should be given strong consideration even in elderly patients.
2019
Elderly; Kidney cancer; Localized renal cell carcinoma; Nephrectomy; Renal cell carcinoma; Urology
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/75615
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 19
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 20
social impact