Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the properties of fiber- reinforced composite and stainless steel twisted retainers for orthodontic retention. Methods: Three different span lengths (5.0, 8.0, and 14.0 mm) of fiber-reinforced composite were investigated. The three fiber-reinforced composite retainer groups were subdivided according to the storage condition (dry and wet), resulting in a total of six groups. Each stainless steel and fiber- reinforced composite group was comprised of six specimens. The three- point bending flexural test was conducted using a universal testing machine. ANOVA was used to assess differences in the maximum load and maximum stress according to the span length, material, and storage condition. Post-hoc comparisons were performed if necessary. Results: The maximum stress and maximum load were significantly ( p < 0.001) associated with the span length, material, and storage condition. The significant interaction between the material and span length ( p < 0.001) indicated the differential effects of the material for each span length on the maximum stress and maximum load, with the difference between materials being the highest for the maximum span length. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that fiber-reinforced composite retainers may be an effective alternative for orthodontic retention in patients with esthetic concerns or allergy to conventional stainless steel wires.

Comparison between fiber-reinforced polymers and stainless steel orthodontic retainers / Lucchese, Alessandra; Manuelli, Maurizio; Ciuffreda, Claudio; Albertini, Paolo; Gherlone, Enrico; Perillo, Letizia. - In: THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS. - ISSN 2234-7518. - (2018). [10.4041/kjod.2018.48.2.107]

Comparison between fiber-reinforced polymers and stainless steel orthodontic retainers

Lucchese, Alessandra
Primo
;
Gherlone, Enrico
Penultimo
;
2018-01-01

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the properties of fiber- reinforced composite and stainless steel twisted retainers for orthodontic retention. Methods: Three different span lengths (5.0, 8.0, and 14.0 mm) of fiber-reinforced composite were investigated. The three fiber-reinforced composite retainer groups were subdivided according to the storage condition (dry and wet), resulting in a total of six groups. Each stainless steel and fiber- reinforced composite group was comprised of six specimens. The three- point bending flexural test was conducted using a universal testing machine. ANOVA was used to assess differences in the maximum load and maximum stress according to the span length, material, and storage condition. Post-hoc comparisons were performed if necessary. Results: The maximum stress and maximum load were significantly ( p < 0.001) associated with the span length, material, and storage condition. The significant interaction between the material and span length ( p < 0.001) indicated the differential effects of the material for each span length on the maximum stress and maximum load, with the difference between materials being the highest for the maximum span length. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that fiber-reinforced composite retainers may be an effective alternative for orthodontic retention in patients with esthetic concerns or allergy to conventional stainless steel wires.
2018
Orthodontic materials, Orthodontic retainers, Fiber-reinforced composite
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Comparison between fiber-reinforced polymers and stainless steel orthodontic retainers.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: PDF editoriale (versione pubblicata dall'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.06 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.06 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/79132
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact