ntroductionRotary nickel-titanium instruments have multiple advantages but with the risk of more fractures because of flexure or torsion. Alternating rotation appears to be an alternative to continuous rotary movement. The objective of this study was to determine the influence of the type of instrument rotation on the frequency of fractures or deformation.MethodsInstrumentation was performed on 120 molar root canals with an angle of curvature greater than 30° using alternating rotation (group A: 60° clockwise, 45° counterclockwise) and continuous rotation (group B).ResultsThe results indicate that instruments used with alternating rotation have a higher mean number of uses (13.0) compared with the continuous rotation group (10.05); this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05).ConclusionsThe ProTaper shaping instruments (S1 and S2) are those that achieved the greatest difference in use with alternating rotation, with S2 being the most resistant to fracture or deformation with the two types of movement used.
Alternating versus Continuous Rotation: A Comparative Study of the Effect on Instrument Life / Purificación Varela, Patiño; Adalce Ibañez, Párraga; Berta Rivas, Mundiña; Cantatore, Giuseppe; Xosé Luis, Otero; Benjamin Martin, Biedma. - In: JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS. - ISSN 0099-2399. - 36:(2010), pp. 157-159. [10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.023]
Alternating versus Continuous Rotation: A Comparative Study of the Effect on Instrument Life
CANTATORE, GIUSEPPE
Writing – Review & Editing
;
2010-01-01
Abstract
ntroductionRotary nickel-titanium instruments have multiple advantages but with the risk of more fractures because of flexure or torsion. Alternating rotation appears to be an alternative to continuous rotary movement. The objective of this study was to determine the influence of the type of instrument rotation on the frequency of fractures or deformation.MethodsInstrumentation was performed on 120 molar root canals with an angle of curvature greater than 30° using alternating rotation (group A: 60° clockwise, 45° counterclockwise) and continuous rotation (group B).ResultsThe results indicate that instruments used with alternating rotation have a higher mean number of uses (13.0) compared with the continuous rotation group (10.05); this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05).ConclusionsThe ProTaper shaping instruments (S1 and S2) are those that achieved the greatest difference in use with alternating rotation, with S2 being the most resistant to fracture or deformation with the two types of movement used.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
