It has been brought to our attention that for the secondary outcome of tumour response, we reported an incorrect p value of 0.04 for a χ2 test comparing the groups. A careful reanalysis of all our results revealed that the p value is in fact 0.054 for this secondary outcome. However, we believe that given the low number of patients included in the study, a p value 0.054 instead of 0.04, which demonstrates borderline significance, does not invalidate the main study results. Conflicts of interest The authors have nothing to disclose.

Corrigendum re “Neoadjuvant Short-term Intensive Intravesical Mitomycin C Regimen Compared with Weekly Schedule for Low-grade Recurrent Non–muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Preliminary Results of a Randomised Phase 2 Study” (European Urology (2012) 62(5) (797–802), (S0302283812006082) (10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.032))

Briganti, Alberto;Salonia, Andrea;Rigatti, Patrizio;Montorsi, Francesco
2019-01-01

Abstract

It has been brought to our attention that for the secondary outcome of tumour response, we reported an incorrect p value of 0.04 for a χ2 test comparing the groups. A careful reanalysis of all our results revealed that the p value is in fact 0.054 for this secondary outcome. However, we believe that given the low number of patients included in the study, a p value 0.054 instead of 0.04, which demonstrates borderline significance, does not invalidate the main study results. Conflicts of interest The authors have nothing to disclose.
2019
Urology
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/85188
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact