Introduction. - Myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) is the first cause of CNV in young patients. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of intravitreal injections (IVT) of ranibizumab with photodynamic therapy (PDT) in this indication. Patients and methods. - Retrospective comparative study analyzing the visual acuity (VA) outcomes of CNV myopic patients treated with either IVT or PDT. Results. - Twenty-seven eyes of 25 patients were treated with PDT (group 1) and 18 eyes of 17 patients were treated with IVT of ranibizumab (group 2). Demographic data were similar in the two groups. The median initial VA was 20/80 for group 1 and 20/160 for group 2 (P = 0.37). At 1 year, the median VA was 20/80 for group 1 (P = 0.32) and 20/63 for group 2 (P = 0.04). A significant improvement in VA was observed in 23.1% and in 27.3% of cases in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = 0.53). A significant VA worsening was observed in 34.6% of cases in group 1 and in 9.1% of cases in group 2 (P = 0.21). Conclusion. - IVT of ranibizumab compared to PDT treatment showed greater efficacy in this study. (C) 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Efficacy of intravitreal injections of ranibizumab compared to visudyne phototherapy in myopic choroidal neovascularization associated with high myopia

QUERQUES , GIUSEPPE;
2012-01-01

Abstract

Introduction. - Myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) is the first cause of CNV in young patients. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of intravitreal injections (IVT) of ranibizumab with photodynamic therapy (PDT) in this indication. Patients and methods. - Retrospective comparative study analyzing the visual acuity (VA) outcomes of CNV myopic patients treated with either IVT or PDT. Results. - Twenty-seven eyes of 25 patients were treated with PDT (group 1) and 18 eyes of 17 patients were treated with IVT of ranibizumab (group 2). Demographic data were similar in the two groups. The median initial VA was 20/80 for group 1 and 20/160 for group 2 (P = 0.37). At 1 year, the median VA was 20/80 for group 1 (P = 0.32) and 20/63 for group 2 (P = 0.04). A significant improvement in VA was observed in 23.1% and in 27.3% of cases in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = 0.53). A significant VA worsening was observed in 34.6% of cases in group 1 and in 9.1% of cases in group 2 (P = 0.21). Conclusion. - IVT of ranibizumab compared to PDT treatment showed greater efficacy in this study. (C) 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/8670
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact