Background. rib compare laparoscopic and laparotomic techniques for the excision of incidental adrenal tumors. Materials and methods. Twenty patients with silent adrenal tumor underwent adrenalectomy or tumor excision through the laparotomic (LPT Group: 12 cases) or laparoscopic (LPS Group: 8 cases) approach. LPT Group and LPS Group were comparatively analyzed in terms of age, gender, Body Mass Index (BMI), concomitant diseases, previous upper abdominal surgery, tumor side and size, type of operation (excision vs adrenalectomy), associated procedures, and pathology. The two, groups were then compared for intra/postoperative complications, length of operation, and postoperative ileus, pain, hospitalization. comparisons were performed also adjusting for variables (BMI, depression, tumor size) unhomogeneously distributed between the two groups. Results. LPT Group and LPS Group were comparable when evaluated forage, gender, BMI, concomitant diseases (except for depression), previous upper abdominal surgery, tumor side, type of operation, associated procedures, and pathology. Tumor size (LPT>LPS, p=0.03) and depression (LPT

Impact of minimally invasive surgery on adrenalectomy for incidental tumors: Comparison with laparotomic technique / Aldrighetti, L; Giacomelli, M; Calori, G; Paganelli, M; Ferla, G; RI International Surgery, ICS/D-3993-2011. - In: INTERNATIONAL SURGERY. - ISSN 0020-8868. - 82:2(1997), pp. 160-164.

Impact of minimally invasive surgery on adrenalectomy for incidental tumors: Comparison with laparotomic technique

Aldrighetti L;
1997-01-01

Abstract

Background. rib compare laparoscopic and laparotomic techniques for the excision of incidental adrenal tumors. Materials and methods. Twenty patients with silent adrenal tumor underwent adrenalectomy or tumor excision through the laparotomic (LPT Group: 12 cases) or laparoscopic (LPS Group: 8 cases) approach. LPT Group and LPS Group were comparatively analyzed in terms of age, gender, Body Mass Index (BMI), concomitant diseases, previous upper abdominal surgery, tumor side and size, type of operation (excision vs adrenalectomy), associated procedures, and pathology. The two, groups were then compared for intra/postoperative complications, length of operation, and postoperative ileus, pain, hospitalization. comparisons were performed also adjusting for variables (BMI, depression, tumor size) unhomogeneously distributed between the two groups. Results. LPT Group and LPS Group were comparable when evaluated forage, gender, BMI, concomitant diseases (except for depression), previous upper abdominal surgery, tumor side, type of operation, associated procedures, and pathology. Tumor size (LPT>LPS, p=0.03) and depression (LPT
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/93763
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact