Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with multipoint left ventricular (LV) pacing (MultiPoint™ Pacing [MPP], St. Jude Medical) improves acute LV function and LV reverse remodeling at 3 months. Objective The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that MPP can also improve LV function at 12 months. Methods Consecutive patients receiving a CRT implant (Unify Quadra MP™ or Quadra Assura MP™ CRT-D and Quartet™ LV lead, St. Jude Medical) were randomized to receive pressure-volume (PV) loop optimized biventricular pacing with either conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CONV) or MPP. CRT response was defined by a reduction in end-systolic volume (ESV) 15% relative to BASELINE as determined by a blinded observer and alive status. Results Forty-four patients (New York Heart Association class III, ejection fraction [EF] 29% ± 6%, QRS 152 ± 17 ms) were enrolled and randomized to either CONV (N = 22) or MPP (N = 22). During the observation period, 2 patients died of noncardiac causes and 2 patients were lost to follow-up. After 12 months, 12 of 21 patients (57%) in the CONV group and 16 of 21 patients (76%) in the MPP group were classified as CRT responders (P =.33). ESV reduction and EF increase relative to BASELINE were significantly greater with MPP than with CONV (ESV: median -25%, interquartile range [IQR] [-39% to -20%] vs median -18%, IQR [-25% to -2%], P =.03; EF: median +15%, IQR [8% to 20%] vs median +5%, IQR [-1% to 8%], P <.001). Conclusion Sustaining the trend observed 3 months postimplant, PV loop-guided multipoint LV pacing resulted in greater LV reverse remodeling and increased LV function at 12 months compared to PV loop-guided conventional CRT.
Improving cardiac resynchronization therapy response with multipoint left ventricular pacing: Twelve-month follow-up study / Pappone, C.; Calovic, Z.; Vicedomini, G.; Cuko, A.; Mcspadden, L. C.; Ryu, K.; Jordan, C. D.; Romano, E.; Baldi, M.; Saviano, M.; Pappone, A.; Vitale, R.; Catalano, C.; Ciaccio, C.; Giannelli, L.; Ionescu, B.; Petretta, A.; Fragakis, N.; Fundaliotis, A.; Tavazzi, L.; Santinelli, V.. - In: HEART RHYTHM. - ISSN 1547-5271. - 12:6(2015), pp. 1250-1258. [10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.02.008]
Improving cardiac resynchronization therapy response with multipoint left ventricular pacing: Twelve-month follow-up study
Pappone C.;Pappone A.;
2015-01-01
Abstract
Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with multipoint left ventricular (LV) pacing (MultiPoint™ Pacing [MPP], St. Jude Medical) improves acute LV function and LV reverse remodeling at 3 months. Objective The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that MPP can also improve LV function at 12 months. Methods Consecutive patients receiving a CRT implant (Unify Quadra MP™ or Quadra Assura MP™ CRT-D and Quartet™ LV lead, St. Jude Medical) were randomized to receive pressure-volume (PV) loop optimized biventricular pacing with either conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CONV) or MPP. CRT response was defined by a reduction in end-systolic volume (ESV) 15% relative to BASELINE as determined by a blinded observer and alive status. Results Forty-four patients (New York Heart Association class III, ejection fraction [EF] 29% ± 6%, QRS 152 ± 17 ms) were enrolled and randomized to either CONV (N = 22) or MPP (N = 22). During the observation period, 2 patients died of noncardiac causes and 2 patients were lost to follow-up. After 12 months, 12 of 21 patients (57%) in the CONV group and 16 of 21 patients (76%) in the MPP group were classified as CRT responders (P =.33). ESV reduction and EF increase relative to BASELINE were significantly greater with MPP than with CONV (ESV: median -25%, interquartile range [IQR] [-39% to -20%] vs median -18%, IQR [-25% to -2%], P =.03; EF: median +15%, IQR [8% to 20%] vs median +5%, IQR [-1% to 8%], P <.001). Conclusion Sustaining the trend observed 3 months postimplant, PV loop-guided multipoint LV pacing resulted in greater LV reverse remodeling and increased LV function at 12 months compared to PV loop-guided conventional CRT.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.