Introduction: The quantitative analysis of sexual dimorphism of facial structures may valuably support reconstructive and feminization surgery, thanks to the estimation of metrical thresholds useful for distinguishing male and female traits. This study aims at verifying the metrical characteristics of female and male lips, to provide indications for aesthetic surgery. Methods: Thirty healthy Caucasian volunteers (20 men and 20 women) were divided into two groups according to age: 21–34 years and 45–65 years. Arches and the cutaneous (external) and mucosal (internal) labial surfaces were reproduced by stone models, and digitised using a computerised electromechanical instrument. Area, volume and thickness were measured separately for the upper and lower lips, and compared between sexes and ages by Student’s t test, and multinomial logistic regression. Results: All lip measurements were larger in males than in females; upper lip thickness best divided males from females, adopting a 9.5-mm threshold (percentage of correct diagnosis: 85 %). Young subjects always showed higher measurements than old subjects; lower lip thickness provided the highest percentage of correct age diagnosis (85 %, adopting a 13.8-mm threshold). Conclusion: This study provides novel thresholds that may contribute to the assessment of adequate reconstruction of lips in aesthetic surgery. Level of Evidence III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

A Quantitative Analysis of Lip Aesthetics: The Influence of Gender and Aging

Rosati R.;Dolci C.;
2015-01-01

Abstract

Introduction: The quantitative analysis of sexual dimorphism of facial structures may valuably support reconstructive and feminization surgery, thanks to the estimation of metrical thresholds useful for distinguishing male and female traits. This study aims at verifying the metrical characteristics of female and male lips, to provide indications for aesthetic surgery. Methods: Thirty healthy Caucasian volunteers (20 men and 20 women) were divided into two groups according to age: 21–34 years and 45–65 years. Arches and the cutaneous (external) and mucosal (internal) labial surfaces were reproduced by stone models, and digitised using a computerised electromechanical instrument. Area, volume and thickness were measured separately for the upper and lower lips, and compared between sexes and ages by Student’s t test, and multinomial logistic regression. Results: All lip measurements were larger in males than in females; upper lip thickness best divided males from females, adopting a 9.5-mm threshold (percentage of correct diagnosis: 85 %). Young subjects always showed higher measurements than old subjects; lower lip thickness provided the highest percentage of correct age diagnosis (85 %, adopting a 13.8-mm threshold). Conclusion: This study provides novel thresholds that may contribute to the assessment of adequate reconstruction of lips in aesthetic surgery. Level of Evidence III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
2015
Aesthetic surgery
Facial anatomy
Feminization surgery
Lips
Transsexualism
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Aging
European Continental Ancestry Group
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Evidence-Based Medicine
Female
Healthy Volunteers
Humans
Lip
Male
Middle Aged
Predictive Value of Tests
Sex Factors
Young Adult
Esthetics
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/110018
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 33
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 28
social impact