To evaluate the reliability and convergent validity of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (SCID-5-AMPD) Module I and Module II, 88 adult psychotherapy participants were administered the Italian translations of the SCID-5-AMPD Module I and Module II, Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form (LPFS-BF), Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Self Report (LPFS-SF), Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5), Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4+ (PDQ-4+), and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Personality Disorders (SCID-5-PD) relying on a Williams crossover design. SCID-5-AMPD Module I and Module II showed excellent inter-rater reliability. In terms of convergent validity, meaningful associations were observed between SCID-5-AMPD Module I scores and self-report measures of Criterion A; similarly, SCID-5-AMPD Module II trait scores were meaningfully related to PID-5 trait scores. As a whole, our preliminary findings supported the clinical utility of DSM-5 AMPD.

The inter-rater reliability and validity of the Italian translation of the structured clinical interview for DSM-5 alternative model for personality disorders module i and module ii: A preliminary report on consecutively admitted psychotherapy outpatients / Somma, Antonella; Borroni, S.; Gialdi, G.; Carlotta, D.; Giarolli, L. E.; Barranca, M.; Cerioli, C.; Franzoni, C.; Masci, E.; Manini, R.; Busso, S. L.; Ruotolo, G.; Krueger, R. F.; Markon, K. E.; Fossati, A.. - In: JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS. - ISSN 0885-579X. - 34:Supplement C(2020), pp. 95-123. [10.1521/pedi_2020_34_511]

The inter-rater reliability and validity of the Italian translation of the structured clinical interview for DSM-5 alternative model for personality disorders module i and module ii: A preliminary report on consecutively admitted psychotherapy outpatients

Somma Antonella
Primo
;
Borroni S.
Secondo
;
Gialdi G.;Barranca M.;Cerioli C.;Franzoni C.;Masci E.;Manini R.;Busso S. L.;Ruotolo G.;Fossati A.
Ultimo
2020-01-01

Abstract

To evaluate the reliability and convergent validity of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (SCID-5-AMPD) Module I and Module II, 88 adult psychotherapy participants were administered the Italian translations of the SCID-5-AMPD Module I and Module II, Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form (LPFS-BF), Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Self Report (LPFS-SF), Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5), Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4+ (PDQ-4+), and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Personality Disorders (SCID-5-PD) relying on a Williams crossover design. SCID-5-AMPD Module I and Module II showed excellent inter-rater reliability. In terms of convergent validity, meaningful associations were observed between SCID-5-AMPD Module I scores and self-report measures of Criterion A; similarly, SCID-5-AMPD Module II trait scores were meaningfully related to PID-5 trait scores. As a whole, our preliminary findings supported the clinical utility of DSM-5 AMPD.
2020
Criterion A
Criterion B
LPFS
Personality disorders
PID-5
SCID-5-AMPD
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Somma_2020_SCID-5-AMPD.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: PDF editoriale (versione pubblicata dall'editore)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 678.31 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
678.31 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/117575
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 16
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact