To evaluate the reliability and convergent validity of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (SCID-5-AMPD) Module I and Module II, 88 adult psychotherapy participants were administered the Italian translations of the SCID-5-AMPD Module I and Module II, Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form (LPFS-BF), Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Self Report (LPFS-SF), Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5), Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4+ (PDQ-4+), and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Personality Disorders (SCID-5-PD) relying on a Williams crossover design. SCID-5-AMPD Module I and Module II showed excellent inter-rater reliability. In terms of convergent validity, meaningful associations were observed between SCID-5-AMPD Module I scores and self-report measures of Criterion A; similarly, SCID-5-AMPD Module II trait scores were meaningfully related to PID-5 trait scores. As a whole, our preliminary findings supported the clinical utility of DSM-5 AMPD.
The inter-rater reliability and validity of the Italian translation of the structured clinical interview for DSM-5 alternative model for personality disorders module i and module ii: A preliminary report on consecutively admitted psychotherapy outpatients / Somma, Antonella; Borroni, S.; Gialdi, G.; Carlotta, D.; Giarolli, L. E.; Barranca, M.; Cerioli, C.; Franzoni, C.; Masci, E.; Manini, R.; Busso, S. L.; Ruotolo, G.; Krueger, R. F.; Markon, K. E.; Fossati, A.. - In: JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS. - ISSN 0885-579X. - 34:Supplement C(2020), pp. 95-123. [10.1521/pedi_2020_34_511]
The inter-rater reliability and validity of the Italian translation of the structured clinical interview for DSM-5 alternative model for personality disorders module i and module ii: A preliminary report on consecutively admitted psychotherapy outpatients
Somma AntonellaPrimo
;Borroni S.Secondo
;Gialdi G.;Barranca M.;Cerioli C.;Franzoni C.;Masci E.;Manini R.;Busso S. L.;Ruotolo G.;Fossati A.
Ultimo
2020-01-01
Abstract
To evaluate the reliability and convergent validity of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (SCID-5-AMPD) Module I and Module II, 88 adult psychotherapy participants were administered the Italian translations of the SCID-5-AMPD Module I and Module II, Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form (LPFS-BF), Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Self Report (LPFS-SF), Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5), Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4+ (PDQ-4+), and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Personality Disorders (SCID-5-PD) relying on a Williams crossover design. SCID-5-AMPD Module I and Module II showed excellent inter-rater reliability. In terms of convergent validity, meaningful associations were observed between SCID-5-AMPD Module I scores and self-report measures of Criterion A; similarly, SCID-5-AMPD Module II trait scores were meaningfully related to PID-5 trait scores. As a whole, our preliminary findings supported the clinical utility of DSM-5 AMPD.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Somma_2020_SCID-5-AMPD.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
PDF editoriale (versione pubblicata dall'editore)
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
678.31 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
678.31 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.