This article offers a philosophical and historical assessment of the reception of Sigmund Freud in the work of Stanley Cavell. In the first half, I argue that every major theme in Cavell’s philosophy entails a dialogue, sometimes explicit and sometimes implicit, with the Freudian model. To this end, I analyse the psychoanalytical motives in Cavell’s therapeutic and later perfectionist understanding of philosophy, reframing of the problem of scepticism, and literary and film criticism. The second half of the article is devoted to the sources and interlocutors in Cavell’s engagement with psychoanalysis, the most important of which are shown to be non-analytic and even non-philosophical, and in particular literary. Cavell, as I recount, had become a committed reader of Freud in 1947, well before beginning his training in professional philosophy. I thus contend that, in spite of the indifference or even hostility towards Freud that Cavell found in the academic circles in which he was educated and then taught, his reflections on psychoanalysis received their nourishment, outside the philosophy departments of American universities, in figures such as the literary and cultural critic Lionel Trilling.
Freud and Philosophy in Stanley Cavell / Ariano, Raffaele. - In: PHILOSOPHICAL INQUIRIES. - ISSN 2282-0248. - XI:1(2023), pp. 9-29. [10.4454/philinq.v11i1.375]
Freud and Philosophy in Stanley Cavell
Raffaele Ariano
2023-01-01
Abstract
This article offers a philosophical and historical assessment of the reception of Sigmund Freud in the work of Stanley Cavell. In the first half, I argue that every major theme in Cavell’s philosophy entails a dialogue, sometimes explicit and sometimes implicit, with the Freudian model. To this end, I analyse the psychoanalytical motives in Cavell’s therapeutic and later perfectionist understanding of philosophy, reframing of the problem of scepticism, and literary and film criticism. The second half of the article is devoted to the sources and interlocutors in Cavell’s engagement with psychoanalysis, the most important of which are shown to be non-analytic and even non-philosophical, and in particular literary. Cavell, as I recount, had become a committed reader of Freud in 1947, well before beginning his training in professional philosophy. I thus contend that, in spite of the indifference or even hostility towards Freud that Cavell found in the academic circles in which he was educated and then taught, his reflections on psychoanalysis received their nourishment, outside the philosophy departments of American universities, in figures such as the literary and cultural critic Lionel Trilling.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
1_ES_Ariano_9_file.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
PDF editoriale (versione pubblicata dall'editore)
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
294.64 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
294.64 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.