Background: Management of mediastinal anastomotic leaks (MALs) after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy includes conservative, endoscopic, or surgical management. Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVAC) is becoming a routine approach for MALs, although the outcomes have not been defined. Purpose: This study describes the incidence, treatment, and outcomes of MALs in patients who underwent esophagectomy in three Italian high-volume centers that routinely use EVAC for MAL. Methods: Patients who underwent Ivor Lewis esophagectomy between September 2018 and March 2023 were included. Results: A total of 681 patients underwent Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, of whom 88 had an MAL. MAL rates for open, minimally invasive, and robotic esophagectomy were 11.5%, 13.4%, and 14.8%, respectively. Global and specific 30- and 90-day mortality rates for MAL were 0.9% and 2.1% and 6.8% and 15.9%, respectively. Nonoperative management (NOM) as primary treatment was chosen for 62 patients. The most common NOM and OM was EVAC (62.9%) and anastomotic redo (53.8%), respectively. Diversion was the OM for seven patients, three of whom died. Primary treatment proved successful in 40 patients. Among them, EVAC alone was successful in 35.9% of patients. Globally, endoscopic treatment including EVAC was successful in 79% of NOM and 55.7% of MALs. NOM and OM were chosen as secondary treatment for 27 and 10 patients, respectively. Secondary treatment proved successful in 21 patients. Conclusions: The incidence of MAL after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy is approximately 13%. Endoscopic techniques have a success rate of almost 80%, with EVAC representing a significant part of this treatment process.

MULTICENTER STUDY ON THE INCIDENCE AND TREATMENT OF MEDIASTINAL LEAKS AFTER ESOPHAGECTOMY (MUMELE 2) / Ascari, Filippo; De Pascale, Stefano; Rosati, Riccardo; Giacopuzzi, Simone; Puccetti, Francesco; Weindelmayer, Jacopo; Cusin, Sofia; Leone, Barbara; Fumagalli Romario, Uberto. - In: JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY. - ISSN 1091-255X. - 28:7(2024), pp. 1072-1077. [10.1016/j.gassur.2024.04.024]

MULTICENTER STUDY ON THE INCIDENCE AND TREATMENT OF MEDIASTINAL LEAKS AFTER ESOPHAGECTOMY (MUMELE 2)

Rosati, Riccardo;Puccetti, Francesco;Cusin, Sofia;
2024-01-01

Abstract

Background: Management of mediastinal anastomotic leaks (MALs) after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy includes conservative, endoscopic, or surgical management. Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVAC) is becoming a routine approach for MALs, although the outcomes have not been defined. Purpose: This study describes the incidence, treatment, and outcomes of MALs in patients who underwent esophagectomy in three Italian high-volume centers that routinely use EVAC for MAL. Methods: Patients who underwent Ivor Lewis esophagectomy between September 2018 and March 2023 were included. Results: A total of 681 patients underwent Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, of whom 88 had an MAL. MAL rates for open, minimally invasive, and robotic esophagectomy were 11.5%, 13.4%, and 14.8%, respectively. Global and specific 30- and 90-day mortality rates for MAL were 0.9% and 2.1% and 6.8% and 15.9%, respectively. Nonoperative management (NOM) as primary treatment was chosen for 62 patients. The most common NOM and OM was EVAC (62.9%) and anastomotic redo (53.8%), respectively. Diversion was the OM for seven patients, three of whom died. Primary treatment proved successful in 40 patients. Among them, EVAC alone was successful in 35.9% of patients. Globally, endoscopic treatment including EVAC was successful in 79% of NOM and 55.7% of MALs. NOM and OM were chosen as secondary treatment for 27 and 10 patients, respectively. Secondary treatment proved successful in 21 patients. Conclusions: The incidence of MAL after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy is approximately 13%. Endoscopic techniques have a success rate of almost 80%, with EVAC representing a significant part of this treatment process.
2024
Esophagectomy
endoscopic vacuum therapy
mediastinal leak
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Post-print (versione valutata in peer review)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 931.17 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
931.17 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/160396
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact