Background and Aims: Gastric cancer (GC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, frequently diagnosed at advanced stages. High-risk features-tumor size >= 40 mm, cT3/cT4, nodal involvement, diffuse histology, and Borrmann type III/IV-are associated with peritoneal metastasis (PM). Staging laparoscopy with peritoneal washing (PW) is superior to conventional preoperative imaging modalities, including contrast-enhanced CT, MRI, PET/CT and endoscopic ultrasound, in detecting occult peritoneal disease. In this era of personalized medicine and expanding loco-regional strategies such as cytoreductive surgery (CRS)/Hyperthermic IntraPEritoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) and Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC), accurate staging is crucial. This study assessed the impact of SL and PW in high-risk GC. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 113 consecutive high-risk GC patients who underwent SL and PW between 2014 and 2024 at our institution. The primary endpoint was detection of PM or positive cytology (CY+). Secondary endpoints were treatment modification, eligibility for loco-regional therapy, and safety. Results: SL/PW identified PM or CY+ in 26 patients (23%), including 16 with CY+ only. None had radiologic signs of peritoneal disease. SL findings altered treatment in all cases: 21 patients (81%) with Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) < 6 underwent induction chemotherapy followed by CRS + HIPEC; 5 patients (PCI > 6) were spared non-therapeutic laparotomy and treated with bidirectional systemic chemotherapy and PIPAC. In 10 patients, systemic therapy was shifted from FLOT (fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel) to FOLFOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) +/- nivolumab. No perioperative complications occurred; all patients were discharged within 24 h without delay in systemic treatment. Conclusions: SL with PW is safe and significantly improves staging accuracy in high-risk GC, enabling personalized therapeutic planning. Routine integration of SL should be considered essential in treatment algorithms to guide systemic and loco-regional strategies.

Staging Laparoscopy in High-Risk Gastric Cancer: A Decade of Real-World Evidence and Therapeutic Impact from a Tertiary Referral Center / Cossu, Andrea; Calef, Riccardo; Puccetti, Francesco; Foti, Silvia; Cascinu, Stefano; Rosati, Riccardo; Elmore, Ugo; Null, Null. - In: CANCERS. - ISSN 2072-6694. - 18:1(2025). [10.3390/cancers18010027]

Staging Laparoscopy in High-Risk Gastric Cancer: A Decade of Real-World Evidence and Therapeutic Impact from a Tertiary Referral Center

Calef, Riccardo
Secondo
;
Puccetti, Francesco
;
Cascinu, Stefano;Rosati, Riccardo;Elmore, Ugo
Penultimo
;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Background and Aims: Gastric cancer (GC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, frequently diagnosed at advanced stages. High-risk features-tumor size >= 40 mm, cT3/cT4, nodal involvement, diffuse histology, and Borrmann type III/IV-are associated with peritoneal metastasis (PM). Staging laparoscopy with peritoneal washing (PW) is superior to conventional preoperative imaging modalities, including contrast-enhanced CT, MRI, PET/CT and endoscopic ultrasound, in detecting occult peritoneal disease. In this era of personalized medicine and expanding loco-regional strategies such as cytoreductive surgery (CRS)/Hyperthermic IntraPEritoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) and Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC), accurate staging is crucial. This study assessed the impact of SL and PW in high-risk GC. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 113 consecutive high-risk GC patients who underwent SL and PW between 2014 and 2024 at our institution. The primary endpoint was detection of PM or positive cytology (CY+). Secondary endpoints were treatment modification, eligibility for loco-regional therapy, and safety. Results: SL/PW identified PM or CY+ in 26 patients (23%), including 16 with CY+ only. None had radiologic signs of peritoneal disease. SL findings altered treatment in all cases: 21 patients (81%) with Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) < 6 underwent induction chemotherapy followed by CRS + HIPEC; 5 patients (PCI > 6) were spared non-therapeutic laparotomy and treated with bidirectional systemic chemotherapy and PIPAC. In 10 patients, systemic therapy was shifted from FLOT (fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel) to FOLFOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) +/- nivolumab. No perioperative complications occurred; all patients were discharged within 24 h without delay in systemic treatment. Conclusions: SL with PW is safe and significantly improves staging accuracy in high-risk GC, enabling personalized therapeutic planning. Routine integration of SL should be considered essential in treatment algorithms to guide systemic and loco-regional strategies.
2025
gastric cancer
staging laparoscopy hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC)
peritoneal metastasis
peritoneal cytology
pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC)
hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Staging Laparoscopy in High-Risk Gastri Cancer A Decade of Real-World Evidence and Therapeutic Impact from a Tertiary Referral Center.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: PDF editoriale (versione pubblicata dall'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 232.48 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
232.48 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/196036
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact